Our homework for this week to compare last year's blogs to the mark scheme and work out what kind of mark we might give based on what we've read.
I think this blog deserved a very strong Level 4. It seems to satisfy almost every possible detail of the mark scheme. Idea's are documented at every stage. They are communicated clearly, they are well presented and there has been significant use of ICT throughout. I really liked the way that the blog seemed to form a diary, where the progress of the project was updated regularly and extensively. Planning is documented through use of scanned sheets and photographs. My one slight criticism might be that, in my mind, there seems to be too much text. Whilst photographs and other images feature, the blog is predominately text. The candidate is trying to communicate a very large amount of information and the lines and lines of text make it a daunting read.
Again, I felt that this was a very strong blog. I particularly liked the design; the appearance of the blog certainly gave of a much more approachable impression. The use of text was as concise as possible, whilst still documenting the significant steps in the production process. The use of ICT was very impressive, especially in regards to the frequent use of embedded YouTube clips to better illustrate an idea, or an important piece of research. Speaking of research, it's all there.Communicated clearly, and detailed extensively. Plans for production are detailed sufficiently. Again, this blog would, most likely, gain a Level 4.
I think this blog deserved a very strong Level 4. It seems to satisfy almost every possible detail of the mark scheme. Idea's are documented at every stage. They are communicated clearly, they are well presented and there has been significant use of ICT throughout. I really liked the way that the blog seemed to form a diary, where the progress of the project was updated regularly and extensively. Planning is documented through use of scanned sheets and photographs. My one slight criticism might be that, in my mind, there seems to be too much text. Whilst photographs and other images feature, the blog is predominately text. The candidate is trying to communicate a very large amount of information and the lines and lines of text make it a daunting read. 
Again, I felt that this was a very strong blog. I particularly liked the design; the appearance of the blog certainly gave of a much more approachable impression. The use of text was as concise as possible, whilst still documenting the significant steps in the production process. The use of ICT was very impressive, especially in regards to the frequent use of embedded YouTube clips to better illustrate an idea, or an important piece of research. Speaking of research, it's all there.Communicated clearly, and detailed extensively. Plans for production are detailed sufficiently. Again, this blog would, most likely, gain a Level 4. 
No comments:
Post a Comment